XM tidak menyediakan perkhidmatan kepada penduduk Amerika Syarikat.

China-EU trade Plan B looks too fiddly



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>BREAKINGVIEWS-China-EU trade Plan B looks too fiddly</title></head><body>

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own. Updates to add graphic.

By Katrina Hamlin

HONG KONG, Nov 6 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Beijing and Brussels are once again debating duties on imported Chinese electric cars. The People’s Republic is pushing for alternatives to tariffs, which were finalised by the European Commission just last week. But their potential Plan B looks unwieldy, and could undermine local manufacturing.

The European Union is ready to negotiate. If talks progress, made-in-China EVs, or a portion of those exports, could be subject to minimum prices rather than levies. This could be preferable for BYD 002594.SZ, 1211.HK, Geely 0175.HK and peers. While the new tariffs ranging from 7.8% for Tesla TSLA.O to 35% for SAIC 600104.SS put a chunky dent in carmakers’ margins, a minimum selling price might do less damage if it effectively allowed Chinese vehicles to be sold at similar levels to locally made marques.

From the EU’s point of view, this could help legacy European brands compete, and shows a willingness to work with an increasingly important trade partner. A cordial relationship with China would make it easier for the two sides to protect access to a key market and would be especially valuable to Beijing if Sino-American relations continue to deteriorate under the next U.S. president.

But deciding where to set the floor price is difficult. Using this mechanism to standardise rates for a measure of raspberries or paperclips is easy enough, less so for highly engineered machines with varying specifications.

Even if watchdogs do manage to design a system all parties agree on, enforcement would be challenging. It’s not just checking dealerships across 27 countries. In China, carmakers embroiled in competitive discounting often throw in extras – freebies like software subscriptions and accessories alter the value proposition. Another downside for Brussels is that carmakers may delay or decline to build European production lines, since those investments make more sense in a scenario where they otherwise face hefty levies.

For now, drawn-out deliberations complicate these companies’ future in Europe. China asked carmakers to halt investments in EU member states supporting tariffs, Reuters reported last week, citing sources. Even before that, some had pressed pause: $28 billion Great Wall Motor 601633.SS said in May it would close its European headquarters in Germany, citing “numerous uncertainties”. Battery affiliate SVOLT is shuttering operations there too, the Nikkei reports, citing a source. The sooner Brussels and Beijing agree on the road ahead, the better.

Follow @KatrinaHamlin on X

CONTEXT NEWS

China's commerce ministry on Nov. 1 confirmed that the European Union will send representatives to the country for negotiations regarding price commitments in the electric-vehicle tariff dispute.

On Oct. 29, the European Commission concluded its anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese electric car imports and imposed additional duties of up to 35.3%.

In a statement, the Commission noted that the EU and China would continue to seek alternative approaches to address the bloc’s concerns, and that it remained open to negotiating “price undertakings” with individual exporters.


Graphic: Chinese EV brands lose market share in Europe https://reut.rs/40ASQIl


Editing by Una Galani and Ujjaini Dutta

</body></html>

Penafian: Entiti XM Group menyediakan perkhidmatan pelaksanaan sahaja dan akses ke Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian, yang membolehkan sesorang melihat dan/atau menggunakan kandungan yang ada di dalam atau melalui laman web, tidak bertujuan untuk mengubah atau memperluas, juga tidak mengubah atau mengembangkannya. Akses dan penggunaan tersebut tertakluk kepada: (i) Terma dan Syarat; (ii) Amaran Risiko; dan Penafian Penuh. Oleh itu, kandungan sedemikian disediakan tidak lebih dari sekadar maklumat umum. Terutamanya, perlu diketahui bahawa kandungan Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian bukan permintaan, atau tawaran untuk melakukan transaksi dalam pasaran kewangan. Berdagang dalam mana-mana pasaran kewangan melibatkan tahap risiko yang besar terhadap modal anda.

Semua bahan yang diterbitkan di Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian kami bertujuan hanya untuk tujuan pendidikan/maklumat dan tidak mengandungi – dan tidak boleh dianggap mengandungi nasihat kewangan, cukai pelaburan atau dagangan dan cadangan, atau rekod harga dagangan kami, atau tawaran, atau permintaan untuk suatu transaksi dalam sebarang instrumen kewangan atau promosi kewangan yang tidak diminta kepada anda.

Sebarang kandungan pihak ketiga serta kandungan yang disediakan oleh XM, seperti pendapat, berita, penyelidikan, analisis, harga, maklumat lain atau pautan ke laman web pihak ketiga yang terdapat dalam laman web ini disediakan berdasarkan "seadanya" sebagai ulasan pasaran umum dan bukanlah nasihat pelaburan. Sesuai dengan apa-apa kandungan yang ditafsir sebagai penyelidikan pelaburan, anda mestilah ambil perhatian dan menerima bahawa kandungan tersebut tidak bertujuan dan tidak sediakan berdasarkan keperluan undang-undang yang direka untuk mempromosikan penyelidikan pelaburan bebas dan oleh itu, ia dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah peraturan dan undang-undang yang berkaitan. SIla pastikan bahawa anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi mengenai Penyelidikan Pelaburan Bukan Bebas dan Amaran Risiko mengenai maklumat di atas yang boleh diakses di sini.

Amaran Risiko: Modal anda dalam risiko. Produk yang berleveraj mungkin tidak sesuai untuk semua individu. Sila pertimbangkan Pendedahan Risiko kami.