Jazz, Hikma must face 'reverse payment' claims over narcolepsy drug
By Mike Scarcella
Aug 27 (Reuters) -Drug companies Jazz JAZZ.O and Hikma HIK.L must face claims that they schemed to delay a generic version of Jazz’s blockbuster narcolepsy drug Xyrem, causing health plans to pay higher prices, a U.S. judge in California has ruled.
U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg’s ruling on Monday night in San Francisco cleared a path to trial on some claims in the long-running multidistrict legal action. Some of the plaintiffs' claims were thrown out in the order.
The plaintiffs include Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, the city of Providence, Rhode Island, and New York State Teamsters Council Health and Hospital Fund.
They have alleged Jazz violated U.S. antitrust law through a monetary payment that kept a rival generic off the market longer than it otherwise would have been, and by dispensing Xyrem through a single specialty pharmacy.
Jazz in a statement on Tuesday said the judge's order "meaningfully" trimmed the plaintiffs' claims, and the company remained "confident about the strength of its defenses."
Hikma on Tuesday did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both companies have denied any wrongdoing.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs at Girard Sharp and Motley Rice did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Xyrem, a central nervous system depressant, has been on the market since 2002, when it was manufactured by Orphan Medical. Ireland-based Jazz acquired Orphan in 2005.
The plaintiffs allege Jazz, between 2007 and 2014, raised the price of Xyrem by more than 800%. In 2021, Jazz sold more than $1.8 billion of Xyrem, according to a company report.
Hikma had U.S. regulatory approval for a generic version of Xyrem by 2017. That year, Hikma settled its lawsuit challenging Jazz patents. The plaintiffs allege the accord was an unlawful “reverse payment agreement" that delayed Hikma from marketing generic Xyrem for years. Hikma’s generic entered the market last year.
Jazz has defended its marketing of Xyrem. It told the judge that a U.S. regulatory agency approved the company’s plan to distribute Xyrem through a single pharmacy. Jazz also said there are other treatments for narcolepsy.
Jazz said it had used coupons and other rebates to help keep patients’ costs for Xyrem low and in line with other narcolepsy drugs.
A status hearing in the case is scheduled for October.
The case is In Re: Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate) Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:20-md-02966-RS.
Read more:
Jazz Pharma ruling clears U.S. roadblock for rival narcolepsy drug
Aset Berkaitan
Berita Terkini
Penafian: Entiti XM Group menyediakan perkhidmatan pelaksanaan sahaja dan akses ke Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian, yang membolehkan sesorang melihat dan/atau menggunakan kandungan yang ada di dalam atau melalui laman web, tidak bertujuan untuk mengubah atau memperluas, juga tidak mengubah atau mengembangkannya. Akses dan penggunaan tersebut tertakluk kepada: (i) Terma dan Syarat; (ii) Amaran Risiko; dan Penafian Penuh. Oleh itu, kandungan sedemikian disediakan tidak lebih dari sekadar maklumat umum. Terutamanya, perlu diketahui bahawa kandungan Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian bukan permintaan, atau tawaran untuk melakukan transaksi dalam pasaran kewangan. Berdagang dalam mana-mana pasaran kewangan melibatkan tahap risiko yang besar terhadap modal anda.
Semua bahan yang diterbitkan di Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian kami bertujuan hanya untuk tujuan pendidikan/maklumat dan tidak mengandungi – dan tidak boleh dianggap mengandungi nasihat kewangan, cukai pelaburan atau dagangan dan cadangan, atau rekod harga dagangan kami, atau tawaran, atau permintaan untuk suatu transaksi dalam sebarang instrumen kewangan atau promosi kewangan yang tidak diminta kepada anda.
Sebarang kandungan pihak ketiga serta kandungan yang disediakan oleh XM, seperti pendapat, berita, penyelidikan, analisis, harga, maklumat lain atau pautan ke laman web pihak ketiga yang terdapat dalam laman web ini disediakan berdasarkan "seadanya" sebagai ulasan pasaran umum dan bukanlah nasihat pelaburan. Sesuai dengan apa-apa kandungan yang ditafsir sebagai penyelidikan pelaburan, anda mestilah ambil perhatian dan menerima bahawa kandungan tersebut tidak bertujuan dan tidak sediakan berdasarkan keperluan undang-undang yang direka untuk mempromosikan penyelidikan pelaburan bebas dan oleh itu, ia dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah peraturan dan undang-undang yang berkaitan. SIla pastikan bahawa anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi mengenai Penyelidikan Pelaburan Bukan Bebas dan Amaran Risiko mengenai maklumat di atas yang boleh diakses di sini.
