Luxury’s legal pain is new threat to valuations
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
By Yawen Chen
LONDON, Aug 20 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Not many products get more attractive when you know how the sausage is made. That may particularly be the case for Italian-made luxury goodies. Successive Milanese court rulings on troubled supply chains are a problem for a sector built on prestige and enigma – and may imply further hits to valuations.
A Milan court document in June asserted that subsidiaries of LVMH’s LVMH.PA Christian Dior arm had subjected workers, some of whom were illegal immigrants, to excessively long hours. It also said that safety devices were removed from machinery to speed up operations. Meanwhile, prosecutors are investigating the supply chains of a dozen unnamed luxury brands.
Dior says it has cut ties with the suppliers in question. And while the court alleges that contractors charged the group as little as 53 euros ($57) for producing a handbag that would then go on to retail for 2,600 euros, it’s hardly news that luxury’s high-end brands command high-end prices. That’s one reason why LVMH made a 70% margin after deducting the cost of manufacturing in 2023.
Still, luxury is in a tight spot. Struggling Chinese demand has seen the earnings multiples of LVMH and rival Kering PRTP.PA fall sharply since 2021, and investors may increasingly wonder why barely more than 10% of major fashion brands even disclose their production volumes. This year’s Italian court rulings, which mean both Dior and Armani have had to see companies they own temporarily run by a court-appointed administrator, suggest a further headache: higher costs.
With prices for personal luxury goods in Europe up 50% since 2019, according to HSBC analysts, the average consumer might assume their product is made by well-paid experts in agreeable conditions. Yet the rise of fashion’s “see-now-buy-now” model, which demands shorter delivery between collections, rubs against this. It has arguably incentivised key players to cut production costs too far.
Many brands now roll out up to eight collections a year, compared to just two traditionally. Meanwhile, LVMH and Kering spend around 40% of their revenues on marketing to enhance brand visibility, via buying and renting prime real estate and paying influencers. The sector generally makes 40% of its products with suppliers it directly owns or controls, while another 30% comes via long-term partners that are deemed relatively “safe”. The remainder is where cost pressures may have encouraged some to turn a blind eye, according to one industry expert.
The saga is unlikely to see rich consumers ditch their fancy bags and garb any time soon. But if the negative legal rulings continue, LVMH and rivals will increasingly face a choice. They can invest more in their supply chains by getting more agreeable contractors and doing more unannounced audits, which will hit their margins. Or they can slow the conveyor belt of collections. Neither sounds great for their bottom lines – or their valuations.
Follow @ywchen1 on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Europe's top asset manager Amundi and other investors in LVMH want the French luxury giant to take more aggressive steps to monitor its suppliers' treatment of workers, after Italian prosecutors found sweatshop-like conditions at subcontractors for Christian Dior, one of the flagship brands within the LVMH group, Reuters reported on July 23.
Italy's Competition Authority (AGCM) said on July 17 it had started another investigation into fashion groups Armani and Dior over the alleged exploitation of workers at its suppliers.
An Italian court in June had placed under judicial administration a company owned by the Italian unit of French fashion group Dior for subcontracting its production to Chinese companies that exploited workers. The court in Milan ordered a one-year administration for Manufacturers Dior Srl, according to the ruling seen by Reuters.
Italian prosecutors said Dior paid Italian subcontractors as little as 53 euros ($57) per Dior bag assembled, selling the same style bag in shops for 2,600 euros while failing to implement basic safety requirements, according to court documents reviewed by Reuters.
Dior said it has cut ties with the suppliers in question, that they were only partially assembling leather products and that reports of bags produced at "ridiculously low" costs were among "entirely false" information relayed by the media.
LVMH’s marketing and selling costs tripled in a decade https://reut.rs/4fJEf2u
Big Luxury’s valuations nearly halved from their 2021 peak https://reut.rs/3yHN3W7
Editing by George Hay and Streisand Neto
Aset Berkaitan
Berita Terkini
Penafian: Entiti XM Group menyediakan perkhidmatan pelaksanaan sahaja dan akses ke Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian, yang membolehkan sesorang melihat dan/atau menggunakan kandungan yang ada di dalam atau melalui laman web, tidak bertujuan untuk mengubah atau memperluas, juga tidak mengubah atau mengembangkannya. Akses dan penggunaan tersebut tertakluk kepada: (i) Terma dan Syarat; (ii) Amaran Risiko; dan Penafian Penuh. Oleh itu, kandungan sedemikian disediakan tidak lebih dari sekadar maklumat umum. Terutamanya, perlu diketahui bahawa kandungan Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian bukan permintaan, atau tawaran untuk melakukan transaksi dalam pasaran kewangan. Berdagang dalam mana-mana pasaran kewangan melibatkan tahap risiko yang besar terhadap modal anda.
Semua bahan yang diterbitkan di Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian kami bertujuan hanya untuk tujuan pendidikan/maklumat dan tidak mengandungi – dan tidak boleh dianggap mengandungi nasihat kewangan, cukai pelaburan atau dagangan dan cadangan, atau rekod harga dagangan kami, atau tawaran, atau permintaan untuk suatu transaksi dalam sebarang instrumen kewangan atau promosi kewangan yang tidak diminta kepada anda.
Sebarang kandungan pihak ketiga serta kandungan yang disediakan oleh XM, seperti pendapat, berita, penyelidikan, analisis, harga, maklumat lain atau pautan ke laman web pihak ketiga yang terdapat dalam laman web ini disediakan berdasarkan "seadanya" sebagai ulasan pasaran umum dan bukanlah nasihat pelaburan. Sesuai dengan apa-apa kandungan yang ditafsir sebagai penyelidikan pelaburan, anda mestilah ambil perhatian dan menerima bahawa kandungan tersebut tidak bertujuan dan tidak sediakan berdasarkan keperluan undang-undang yang direka untuk mempromosikan penyelidikan pelaburan bebas dan oleh itu, ia dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah peraturan dan undang-undang yang berkaitan. SIla pastikan bahawa anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi mengenai Penyelidikan Pelaburan Bukan Bebas dan Amaran Risiko mengenai maklumat di atas yang boleh diakses di sini.
