US Supreme Court declines to pause EPA mercury, methane rules
Adds background in paragraphs 6-8
Justices deny emergency requests to halt EPA rules
Challengers argue EPA exceeded its powers
EPA says rules benefit public health, climate
By Andrew Chung, John Kruzel
WASHINGTON, Oct 4 (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Friday to put on hold new federal air pollution rules from President Joe Biden's administration to tighten limits on mercury and methane, acting in challenges brought by a group of states - most of them Republican-led - and industry groups.
The justices denied emergency requests by the states, as well as power and mining, oil and gas companies, to halt the Environmental Protection Agency rules while litigation continues in lower courts.
The regulations, issued under the landmark Clean Air Act anti-pollution law, aim to cut mercury and other metals from coal-fired power plants emissions, as well methane and other gases known as volatile organic compounds from oil and gas production.
The mercury rule tightened limits on emissions of toxic metals for all coal plants by 67% and tightened limits on mercury emissions from lignite coal plants by 70%.
The methane rule restricted flaring - the burning of excess methane during oil and gas production - and required oil companies to monitor for leaks from well sites and compressor stations. It also created a new program for detecting and reporting large methane releases from so-called "super emitters."
The challengers contend that the EPA exceeded its powers in issuing unjustified rules that threaten the U.S. electricity supply and usurp the role of states in establishing emissions standards.
The regulations would benefit public health and the climate, the EPA said.
The mercury rule reduces the risk of heart attacks and cancer caused by such pollutants, as well as developmental delays in children, while reining in methane, which has more warming potential than carbon dioxide and breaks down in the atmosphere more quickly, can have a more immediate impact on limiting climate change, according to the EPA.
Challengers including the states, fossil-fuel industry groups, as well as power, mining and oil and gas companies filed multiple lawsuits in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which in July and August denied requests to pause the regulations pending its review.
The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has restricted the powers of the EPA in some important rulings in recent years.
In June, the court blocked the EPA's "Good Neighbor" rule aimed at reducing ozone emissions that may worsen air pollution in neighboring states. In 2023, the court hobbled the EPA's power to protect wetlands and fight water pollution. In 2022, it imposed limits on the agency's authority under the Clean Air Act to reduce coal- and gas-fired power plant carbon emissions.
Gun, transgender rights, porn cases loom as US Supreme Court returns ID:nL1N3LD18K
Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York and John Kruzel in Washington; Editing by Will Dunham
Berita Terkini
Penafian: Entiti XM Group menyediakan perkhidmatan pelaksanaan sahaja dan akses ke Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian, yang membolehkan sesorang melihat dan/atau menggunakan kandungan yang ada di dalam atau melalui laman web, tidak bertujuan untuk mengubah atau memperluas, juga tidak mengubah atau mengembangkannya. Akses dan penggunaan tersebut tertakluk kepada: (i) Terma dan Syarat; (ii) Amaran Risiko; dan Penafian Penuh. Oleh itu, kandungan sedemikian disediakan tidak lebih dari sekadar maklumat umum. Terutamanya, perlu diketahui bahawa kandungan Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian bukan permintaan, atau tawaran untuk melakukan transaksi dalam pasaran kewangan. Berdagang dalam mana-mana pasaran kewangan melibatkan tahap risiko yang besar terhadap modal anda.
Semua bahan yang diterbitkan di Kemudahan Dagangan Atas Talian kami bertujuan hanya untuk tujuan pendidikan/maklumat dan tidak mengandungi – dan tidak boleh dianggap mengandungi nasihat kewangan, cukai pelaburan atau dagangan dan cadangan, atau rekod harga dagangan kami, atau tawaran, atau permintaan untuk suatu transaksi dalam sebarang instrumen kewangan atau promosi kewangan yang tidak diminta kepada anda.
Sebarang kandungan pihak ketiga serta kandungan yang disediakan oleh XM, seperti pendapat, berita, penyelidikan, analisis, harga, maklumat lain atau pautan ke laman web pihak ketiga yang terdapat dalam laman web ini disediakan berdasarkan "seadanya" sebagai ulasan pasaran umum dan bukanlah nasihat pelaburan. Sesuai dengan apa-apa kandungan yang ditafsir sebagai penyelidikan pelaburan, anda mestilah ambil perhatian dan menerima bahawa kandungan tersebut tidak bertujuan dan tidak sediakan berdasarkan keperluan undang-undang yang direka untuk mempromosikan penyelidikan pelaburan bebas dan oleh itu, ia dianggap sebagai komunikasi pemasaran di bawah peraturan dan undang-undang yang berkaitan. SIla pastikan bahawa anda telah membaca dan memahami Notifikasi mengenai Penyelidikan Pelaburan Bukan Bebas dan Amaran Risiko mengenai maklumat di atas yang boleh diakses di sini.
