Activist investors mount record number of campaigns but win fewer board seats
By Svea Herbst-Bayliss
NEW YORK, July 1 (Reuters) -Activist investors mounted campaigns at a record number of companies globally during the first six months of 2024 but have been less successful in breaking into boardrooms as companies fought back effectively, data from Barclays shows.
Recent notable examples include Elliott Investment Management's targeting of Southwest Airlines LUV.N, while Starboard Value is taking on design software maker Autodesk ADSK.O and Jana Partners is pushing for changes at silicon carbide maker Wolfspeed WOLF.N.
The surge in activity may lead to more costly battles between activist shareholders and management over leadership changes, spin-offs and outright sales in the coming months, bankers, lawyers and investors said.
But uncertainty surrounding when interest rate cuts might come, geopolitical turmoil and a looming U.S. presidential election that could spell big changes in regulatory regimes, could also make corporate fights tougher.
"We are seeing more activity but fewer transactions and that means activist investors may have to dig in and stay around for longer," said Jim Rossman, global head of shareholder advisory at Barclays.
In the first half of the year, Barclays tracked 147 activist campaigns, toppling the previous record of 143 set during the first six months of 2018.
In the second quarter, 86 campaigns were launched, fueling the feverish pace. Elliott was the busiest activist, launching 11 new campaigns this year and committing some $11 billion in capital, the data showed.
While not every campaign is about board seats, the number won provides a good measure of how well companies are defending themselves. During the first half, dissidents won 74 seats, down from 93 in the same period a year ago though prominent activists put in a strong showing in reaching agreements to join boards.
In U.S. proxy fights, activists won only 11% of the seats they sought, down from 65% during the same time in 2023.
Management often persuaded shareholders that current leaders were already pursuing the right strategy and that their board directors were more qualified than the activists' nominees.
For example, hedge funds Trian Fund Management and Blackwells Capital lost their high-profile fights to seat nominees at entertainment giant Disney DIS.N and shareholders at wireless tower owner Crown Castle CCI.N rejected co-founder Ted Miller's appeal to elect him and others to the company's board.
Last year, the average activist had returns of 18%, according to Hedge Fund Research, which may have prompted newcomers to try their hand at corporate fights. Returns for the first five months of 2024, however, have been flat.
Veteran activists including Elliott, which joined the Crown Castle CCI.N board, and Carl Icahn, who was handed two seats at JetBlue JBLU.O, are still securing directorships. The Barclays data showed 24 seats were obtained by "major activist hedge funds" in the first half, compared with 29 in all of 2023.
Pushing for change at tech firms, such as Sachem Head Capital Management's success in joining the board at cloud communications firm Twilio TWLO.N this year, remained a popular trend.
But bankers, lawyers and investors also say some investors are shifting their focus to industrial companies.
Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss; Editing by Edwina Gibbs
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
