Big US banks withstand Fed's commercial real estate shock scenario
By Michelle Conlin
NEW YORK, June 26 (Reuters) -Big U.S. banks survived a hypothetical40% drop in commercial real estate values as a part of the U.S. Federal Reserve's annual health test, easing fears about the banking sector as landlords struggle in a higher-for-longer interest rate world.
As risks mount in the CRE space, investors were lookingto the Fed's "stress tests" to assess how exposed America's lenders are at a time when pandemic-era work habits continue to empty office towers, sending vacancy rates past historic peaks to a record 20%.
“In a lot of respects, there should be a sense of comfort that banks can weather a very nasty storm,” said Chris Marinac, head of research at Janney Montgomery Scott. "Though this doesn’t mean the Fed thinks commercial real estate is out of the woods. It’s still early innings in this credit cycle.”
The Fed's emergency drill tests banks' balance sheets against an imagined severe economic downturn that also includes a 36% decline in U.S.home prices, a 55% drop in equity prices and an unemployment rate of 10%.
The results, released on Wednesday by the Fed, examine whether banks would be able to continue lending to households and businesses in the event of a severe global recession. They also indicate the amount of capital banks need to be considered healthy - and how much they can return to shareholders through dividends and buybacks.
The 31 large banks tested showed they have sufficient capital to absorb nearly $685 billion in losses.
The Fed's disaster test comes more than ayear after the collapse of mid-size lenders Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic. Those failures prompted criticism that the Fed had failed to gauge banks' vulnerabilities against rising interest rates; instead, the Fed imagined interest rates would fall amid a severe recession.
Commercial office space is being closely watchedas $929 billion of the $4.7 trillion of outstanding commercial mortgages held by lenders and investors will come due in 2024, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. This looming maturity wall comes against a backdrop of declining property values and lower rent rolls.
Analysts predict a painful reckoning for CRE, with banks still retaining "considerable concentration risks," according to Moody's Ratings.
Of the banks tested, Goldman Sachs had the highest projected loan loss for commercial real estate, at 15.9%. RBC USA, Capital One and Northern Trust followed, with projections at 15.8%, 14.6% and 13%, respectively.
One criticism of the Fed's stress test by analysts was that it did not include the regional banks that hold the majority of CRE loans. Regional lenders are also less regulated than their larger peers.
Reporting By Michelle Conlin, editing by Deepa Babington
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
