XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

California sues Exxon over global plastic pollution



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UPDATE 4-California sues Exxon over global plastic pollution</title></head><body>

California AG Rob Bonta accuses Exxon of misleading public on recycling

Exxon defends advanced recycling, criticizes lawsuit

Environmental groups support lawsuit, highlight recycling shortcomings

Adds comment from Exxon spokesperson, paragraphs 10-12

By Valerie Volcovici

NEW YORK, Sept 23 (Reuters) -California and several environmental groups sued Exxon Mobil XOM.N on Monday and accused the oil giant of engaging in a decades-long campaign that helped fuel global plastic waste pollution.

Speaking at an event during Climate Week in New York City, California Attorney General Rob Bonta said the state sued Exxon after concluding a nearly two-year investigation that he said showed Exxon was deliberately misleading the public about the limitations of recycling.

"Today's lawsuit shows the fullest picture to date of ExxonMobil's decades-long deception, and we are asking the court to hold ExxonMobil fully accountable for its role in actively creating and exacerbating the plastics pollution crisis through its campaign of deception," Bonta said in a statement.

The investigation mirrors California's previous probes into the oil industry's alleged efforts to mislead the public about climate change, which the state is also suing over. The state has a long-standing adversarial relationship with Big Oil.

Once a major crude supplier, California's oil production has declined steadily for almost four decades, with companies saying the regulatory environment makes it a difficult place to invest.

Exxon rival Chevron Corp CVX.N, a strong critic of California’s policies , said this year it plans to move its headquarters to oil friendly Texas from the state where it was founded.

A coalition of environmental groups including the Sierra Club fileda related lawsuit in the same state court in San Francisco, raisingsimilar allegations against Exxon.

Bonta, a Democrat, said his office specifically had sought information on Exxon's promotion of its "advanced recycling" technology, which uses a process called pyrolysis to turn hard-to-recycle plastic into fuel.

He had said the technology's slow progress was a sign of Exxon's ongoing deception. He said he wants to secure an abatement fund and civil penalties for the harm inflicted by plastics pollution on California.

Exxon pushed back, arguing advanced recycling and similar solutions work and that California itself failed to correct problems in its recycling system.

"Instead of suing us, they could have worked with us to fix the problem and keep plastic out of landfills," said Lauren Kight, spokesperson for Exxon.

Kight said Exxon processed more than 60 million pounds of plastic waste into usable raw materials, keeping it out of landfills through advanced recycling.


'UPHILL BATTLE'

Notre Dame Law School Professor Bruce Huber, who specializes in environmental law, said California may face an "uphill battle" with its lawsuit.

"The state's primary claim relies on public nuisance, a notoriously murky area of law. It could be difficult for a court to grant California relief here without opening a Pandora's box of other, similar claims," he said.

Exxon is the world's largest producer of resins used for single-use plastics, according to a report published last year by the Minderoo Foundation, with consultancies Wood Mackenzie and the Carbon Trust.

Reuters has reported on theenormous obstacles facing advanced recycling that the plastics industry touts as an environmental savior.

California's lawsuit comes ahead of a final round of global plastic treaty negotiations set to take place in Busan, South Korea, at the end of the year.

In those talks, countries are split over whether the treaty should call for caps on plastic production, a position opposed by Exxon and the global petrochemical industry.

The U.S. last month said it supports a treaty designed around global plastic production cuts.

Environmental groups praised the lawsuit. Christy Leavitt, Oceana's plastics campaign director, said California's lawsuit will "hold industry accountable and debunk the plastics recycling narrative that holds us back from real solutions."



Reporting by Valerie Volcovici; Additional reporting by Nate Raymond and Sabrina Valle; Editing by Nick Zieminski and David Gregorio

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.