FCC chair rejects Trump call to pull ABC licenses over presidential debate
Adds FCC commissioner asked about hearing, no immediate Trump or Disney comment, more on issues in paragraphs 4-11
By David Shepardson
WASHINGTON, Sept 19 (Reuters) -The chair of the Federal Communications Commission rejected former U.S. President Donald Trump's suggestion that Walt Disney-owned DIS.N ABC should lose its broadcast licenses over the network's moderating of the Sept. 10 presidential debate.
"The First Amendment is a cornerstone of our democracy. The Commission does not revoke licenses for broadcast stations simply because a political candidate disagrees with or dislikes content or coverage," FCC chair Jessica Rosenworcel said on Thursday.
The FCC, an independent federal agency, does not license broadcast networks, but issues them to individual broadcast stations that are renewed for eight-year periods.
Trump claimed the debate was "rigged" because the ABC News moderators fact checked several comments he made.
"They ought to take away their license for the way they did that," Trump told Fox News.
The Trump campaign and Disney did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Rosenworcel, a Democrat, made the statement after Senators Ed Markey and Ron Wyden had asked all five FCC commissioners to address Trump's comments.
The senators, both Democrats, said the former president's"threat to revoke an FCC license over his dissatisfaction with ABC’s handling of the debate is a serious threat to the First Amendment and antithetical to the FCC’s mission."
Republican FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr said at a House hearing Thursday he would always make decisions consistent with the law and First Amendment but would not answer if he believed the FCC had grounds to revoke the ABC license after the debate.
In 2017, then FCC Chair Ajit Pai, a Republican who served as chair of the FCC after being tapped by Trump, rejected Trump's tweet asserting the FCC could challenge NBC's license after it published stories Trump declared were untrue.
"The FCC under my leadership will stand for the First Amendment," Pai said.
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
When reviewing licenses the FCC must determine if a renewal is in the public interest. Courts have held that First Amendment rights bar the FCC from stripping a license based on editorial decisions.
Rosenworcel said in FCC license reviews do "not involve the government making editorial decisions about content. Doing so would be an affront to our First Amendment tradition."
Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Mark Porter and Lincoln Feast.
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
