Hong Kong probe finds Cathay engine failure due to ruptured fuel hose
Aviation authority found ruptured fuel hose in A350 jet
Incident illustrates potential for fuel leaks -report
AAIA urges Rolls-Royce to impose inspection requirements
Recasts, adds Cathay response in paragraphs 9-10
Sept 19 (Reuters) -A probe by Hong Kong's aviation authority found a ruptured fuel hose caused a mid-flight fire on a Cathay Pacific 0293.HK operated Airbus AIR.PA A350 plane this month.
The aircraft was en-route to Zurich with 348 passengers and crew aboard when the fire was discovered, forcing it to turn back to Hong Kong, where it landed safely. The incident resulted in the grounding of a number of other Cathay flights.
Hong Kong's Air Accident Investigation Authority (AAIA) said on Thursday its investigation had found the ruptured fuel hose in the jet's second engine, with five secondary hoses also showing signs of wear and tear.
"This serious incident illustrates the potential for fuel leaks through the ruptured secondary fuel manifold hose, which could result in engine fires," the AAIA said in a report.
The AAIA also told engine manufacturer Rolls-Royce RR.L to impose certain inspection requirements for such components.
Rolls-Royce did not reply to a request for comment. Airbus did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The AAIA probe confirms a Reuters report which cited sources saying initial checks revealed a hose between a manifold and a fuel injection nozzle was pierced.
"If not promptly detected and addressed, this situation, along with further failures, could escalate into a more serious engine fire, potentially causing extensive damage to the aircraft," the AAIA report said.
Cathay said it had contacted the manufacturers of the aircraft and the engine as well as the regulator after the fire.
"As a precautionary measure, it proactively initiated a fleet-wide inspection of its Airbus A350 aircraft that cleared the aircraft for operation," the Hong Kong flag carrier said in a statement emailed to Reuters.
Cathay began inspecting all its Airbus A350 jets after the incident, saying it was the first component of its type to suffer such a failure on any A350 aircraft worldwide.
The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) also ordered inspections on Airbus A350-1000 engines in a move to prevent similar events after consulting regulators and accident investigators in Hong Kong, as well as Airbus and Rolls-Royce.
The AAIA, in its report, recommended the EASA ask Rolls-Royce to continue giving airworthiness information, including inspection requirements of the secondary fuel manifold hoses of its engines to ensure their serviceability.
Reporting by Rishav Chatterjee, Himanshi Akhand, Sameer Manekar and Rishabh Jaiswal in Bengaluru; Editing by Jacqueline Wong and Alexander Smith
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
