Italy's constitutional court unravels Draghi's energy windfall tax
Ruling paves the way for firms to demand refunds
Emergency does not justify all state demands, Court says
Judges to rule also on Meloni's 2023 windfall tax
Adds Treasury source and details in paragraphs 2, 8
By Giuseppe Fonte
ROME, June 27 (Reuters) -Italy's Constitutional Court ruled on Thursday that part of a 2022windfall tax weighing on energy companies is unlawful, a decision that is expected to haverepercussions for Rome's strained public finances.
The ruling paves the way for firms to demand partial refunds and limits the scope for similar taxes in the future, although a Treasury source told Reuters it would not derail Italy's public finances, saying the impact would be "totally manageable."
In 2022, then-prime minister Mario Draghi introduced a one-off levy that allowed the Treasury to collect 2.8 billion euros ($3 billion), despite criticism and refusals to pay from numerous companies.
Under the scheme, companies should have paid a 25% rate of a value based on operations subject to VAT sales tax. The tax take was used to fund relief measures for families and businesses affected by high energy costs triggered by theRussian invasion of Ukraine.
But the levy was unlawful because it included excise duties in the tax base that companies were forced to use to calculate the sums to be paid, according to the ruling.
"The exceptionality of the moment and the temporary nature of the levy cannot be considered a justification for the introduction of any form of taxation," the Constitutional Court stated in its ruling.
Other people familiar with the mattersaid the impact on public finances may be limited because the Treasury will be able to offset the refunds with sums collected from companies that have still not paid the levy.
Companies that skipped payments had hoped the Court would eliminate the levy in full, as it did in 2015 with the so-called "Robin Hood" tax adopted in 2008 to rein in excessive profits from high oil prices.
Italy's 2023 budget deficit came in at 7.4% of GDP, the highest in the 27-nation European Union. The Treasury plans to bring the fiscal gap below the EU's 3% limit only in 2026.
The Court will also have to rule on the legitimacy of the energy windfall tax introduced by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni for 2023 only, which raised almost 3.5 billion euros from 7,000 producers and sellers of electricity, gas and petrol products.
This levy had a rate equal to 50% of the part of 2022 corporate income that was at least 10% higher than the average income reported between 2018 and 2021.
($1 = 0.9350 euros)
Reporting by Giuseppe Fonte; editing by Gavin Jones, Mark Heinrich and Keith Weir
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
