Japan asset managers back corporate governance push, Oasis founder says
By Scott Murdoch and Anton Bridge
SYDNEY/TOKYO, July 4 (Reuters) -Japanese asset managers are increasingly supporting the targeting of poorly performing firms by activist fund Oasis Management, its founder said, paving the way for more campaigns to improve corporate governance and deliver higher shareholder returns.
Hong Kong-based Oasis, which does not publicly declare its assets under management, has launched high profile campaigns against at least six Japanese companies in the past year demanding changes at those targets.
"Our best allies are domestic asset managers who today see bad corporate governance as shameful," Seth Fischer, Oasis' founder and chief investment officer, said.
The change heralds a potential paradigm shift in Japan's corporate world, with domestic asset managers backing activist engagement that could reshape corporate practices in the country.
Oasis is among the most prominent activist investors operating in Japan with recent targets including the country's largest drugstore chain, Ain Holdings 9627.T, and Kao 4452.T, the world's second-largest cosmetics firm by revenue, according to LSEG data.
The Tokyo Stock Exchange and Japanese government have encouraged firms to improve their corporate governance and capital allocation over the past decade, as they look to lure more global investors.
Measures such as appointing external directors with relevant business experience and adopting key performance indicators in line with global peers have helped Japan's Nikkei .N225 rally 22% in 2024 to an all-time high and captured the attention of global investors, he said.
"All of a sudden Japan's back on the radar. I'm fielding calls from more people than ever before," he said.
Fischer said only 20% of Oasis's engagement with Japanese companies to agitate change becomes public.
"Every single time we've asked the company nicely, privately. When they just don't engage, they hide, they obfuscate, they lie, they pretend we don't exist, they ignore shareholders, their returns continue to diminish, they don't perform, right?," he said.
"Then the board's failing in a job of supervising management and then we have to engage...I'm not shy. We're not shy about doing this."
Oasis scored a major win in 2023 when three outside directors at elevator maker Fujitec 6406.T were replaced by four candidates chosen by Oasis, after which the board voted to oust its chairman.
Oasis, Fujitec's largest shareholder at the time, had criticised the chairman's family's control over the company.
While Japanese companies are doing away with particularly egregious corporate governance malpractice, such as nepotism in hiring and the misappropriation of corporate assets, "check the box governance is not enough," said Fischer.
Boards must hold management to account for all aspects of business performance, including digital transformation and marketing, return on equity, and performance benchmarked against competitors, he added.
There is now a much deeper pool of independent director candidates with real management experience. Oasis used to call upon the same few people to nominate to boards, but now it speaks to up to 100 candidates each time, Fischer said.
Oasis has been active in Japan since its establishment in 2002, and while tangible progress has been made, Oasis has lost money in some cases where it could not effect change - poor governance persisted and the management remained unaccountable, continuing to destroy the company's share value.
"I think in five or 10 years time, people will be shocked at what even went on in 2024, much less what went on in 2013."
Reporting by Scott Murdoch in Sydney and Anton Bridge in Tokyo; Editing by Sumeet Chatterjee and Jacqueline Wong
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
