Law firm Morgan & Morgan sues rival in turf battle over Google ads
By David Thomas
Sept 20 (Reuters) -Plaintiffs' law giant Morgan & Morgan has rekindled an internet advertising fight with another Florida-based law firm, claiming it violated an agreement not to lure customers with misleading Google search results.
Morgan & Morgan, which bills itself as the largest U.S. injury law firm, sued 30-lawyer Morgan Law Group (MLG) on Thursday in state court in Orlando. The lawsuit said MLG paid Google this year so that its name appears at the top of search results for "morgan and morgan."
MLG's bidding on those Google advertising terms violates a settlement agreement the two firms reached in October 2020, the lawsuit said. Morgan & Morgan said it sued MLG in 2017 over its allegedly deceptive advertising practices.
"Regrettably, this is not the first time that the MLG defendants have engaged in misleading and deceptive advertising practices designed to misappropriate current and potential clients of Morgan & Morgan," the lawsuit said.
A spokesperson for Morgan & Morgan did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Thomas J. Morgan, Jr., the founding partner of MLG who was also named as a defendant in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Morgan & Morgan alleges that the firms' settlement prohibits MLG from using a variety of advertising words and keywords on Google and other search engines.
Morgan & Morgan spent nearly $240 million in TV ads in 2023, and $40.3 million in digital ads that year, according to a February report from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform that cited data from advertisement analytics firms Tunnl and Sensor Tower.
Last August, Morgan & Morgan sued a New Jersey marketing company for allegedly paying Google for "click to call" advertisements on searches for the terms "morgan and morgan." When the ads popped up, potential Morgan & Morgan clients were tricked into clicking on a phone number that took them to the marketing firm instead, the lawsuit claimed.
The case was dismissed in July, Florida state court records show.
Morgan & Morgan is seeking an unspecified amount of damages in its new case against MLG. The firm also said in its lawsuit that the settlement agreement contains a fee-shifting provision.
The case is Morgan & Morgan, P.A., v. The Morgan Law Group, P.A., Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit In and For Orange County, Florida, Case No. Unknown
For Morgan & Morgan: Damien Prosser, of Morgan & Morgan
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
