More US firms lean on retired, veteran leaders to steady ship in choppy economy
By Shivansh Tiwary and Aishwarya Venugopal
Oct 22 (Reuters) -CVS Health CVS.N last week named as CEO a tried-and-tested company veteran, the latest in a handful of firms this year that have turned to an experienced executive to take the helm, hoping to quell investor concerns amid economic uncertainty.
Following pressure from an activist investor, CVS hired David Joyner to replace Karen Lynch. During her three-and-a-half year tenure, CVS' stock fell nearly 11%. The company has cut its 2024 profit forecast three times, blaming an increase in Medicare-related costs.
A few weeks earlier, Nike NKE.N had hired former senior executive Elliott Hill to succeed John Donahoe as president and CEO, as it efforts to revive sales and battle competition.
Boeing BA.N named aerospace industry veteran Kelly Ortberg as its CEO earlier this year to turn around the planemaker beset by legal and regulatory problems.
"Investors tend to be comforted when someone with a track record comes in," said Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Wisconsin-based Annex Wealth Management.
"It's one thing if there is a new division or new opportunity, but when there are challenging times, investors often prefer someone who has been through a few economic cycles."
A record number of CEOs have quit in the U.S. this year.
CEO departures jumped 15% to 1,450 between January and August, from the same period a year earlier, according to a report from outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas. The report cited economic uncertainty as one of the main reasons for leadership changes.
On Monday, Walt Disney DIS.N named Morgan Stanley MS.N veteran James Gorman as chair. Gorman had already been tasked with finding a replacement for Disney CEO Bob Iger, a Wall Street favorite who retired from the company in 2021, only to return the next year to deal with a pandemic-related slump.
"The pandemic and subsequent economic challenges led some companies to prioritize stability, experience, and redundancies over innovation and disruption, bringing in experienced leaders to implement immediate turnaround strategies ... rather than for long-term transformation," said Michael Ashley Schulman, chief investment officer at Running Point Capital.
The strategy has, however, met with mixed success.
Famously, Apple AAPL.O founder Steve Jobs left the company in 1985 over differences with then-CEO John Sculley, returning a dozen years later to architect the iPhone. Howard Schultz has held the top job at Starbucks SBUX.O three different times, setting the coffee chain back on track each time its sales faltered.
But things have not worked out the same way for several major American corporations who brought back former CEOs including Dell DELL.N, Twitter, and consumer goods giant Procter & Gamble PG.N.
P&G, for instance, brought back former CEO Alan Lafley in 2013 to reinvigorate sales, but his second tenure was much less fruitful. He was replaced with another company veteran in roughly two years.
Executives who come back to the fold, known as "boomerang CEOs", may either be unable or unwilling to make necessary strategic changes when they return, according to a research paper featured in the MIT Sloan Management Review in 2020.
The annual stock performance of companies led by such CEOs was 10% lower on an average than their first-stint counterparts, the report showed.
"Not everyone is Jobs ... Returning CEOs are usually overconfident, which, when combined with their difficulty of adopting to the constantly evolving business environment, may exacerbate the damage caused by their stubborn fixation on old strategies," said Xu Jiang, associate professor at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business.
Reporting by Aishwarya Venugopal and Shivansh Tiwary in Bengaluru; Editing by Sayantani Ghosh and Sriraj Kalluvila
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
