Nestlé L’Oréal sale would add sugar to sour fix
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
By Aimee Donnellan
LONDON, Sept 5 (Reuters Breakingviews) -The new boss of Nestlé NESN.S may have to embark on a painful turnaround. Last month, the $279 billion food giant replaced its CEO with insider Laurent Freixe, who will probably have to sacrifice profitability to win back market share. But Freixe could offer shareholders a sweetener by selling down part of Nestle's 20% holding in L’Oréal OREP.PA to fund share buybacks.
Nestlé’s stake in the French makeup group dates to 1974. Back then, L’Oréal’s founding Bettencourt family thought that bringing in outside ownership in the form of Nestlé would offer a shield against hostile takeovers. It’s also proved to be a lucrative investment for the Swiss KitKat maker. Since Nestlé first bought shares, L’Oréal has delivered a total shareholder return that’s over five times what Nestlé managed over the same period.
Selling some of the stake could help Nestlé’s new CEO. The board elevated Freixe amid growing frustration with underperformance under long-term boss Mark Schneider, Reuters reported citing sources. The numbers speak for themselves. Revenue growth, excluding the effects of M&A and currency fluctuations, declined from 9.3% at the beginning of 2023 to less than 3% in the second quarter of 2024. The company has lost market share in categories like bottled water.
To boost demand and reignite sales growth, Freixe will probably have to ramp up advertising and marketing. Doing so will dent the company’s operating margin, which stood at a relatively healthy 17% last year. Lower profitability, however, may rile investors who have already pushed down the company’s forward price-earnings multiple to 18, compared with a 10-year average of nearly 22.
L’Oréal offers a solution. Nestlé’s 20.1% stake is worth $47 billion but doesn’t serve an obvious purpose for the Swiss group. Selling a few billion would allow Freixe to fund the extra investments while keeping investors happy. Buying back shares might make financial sense, given the depressed valuation multiple relative to the company’s history.
Selling a large chunk might tank L’Oréal’s stock. One way around the problem would be to sell in small amounts. Another would be to negotiate a directed buyback, where the French company buys some of Nestlé’s shares. That would have the added benefit of entrenching the controlling family’s influence.
Freixe might have other ideas, like finding more cost cuts elsewhere in the business to offset any marketing investments. That effort itself will take time, however. Frustrated shareholders may prefer a quick, sweet treat.
Follow @aimeedonnellan on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Nestlé ousted its CEO Mark Schneider because of the group's underperformance, Reuters reported on Aug. 23 citing three sources familiar with the matter.
Nestlé announced Schneider's departure on Aug. 22 following a board meeting. The consumer-goods group appointed company veteran Laurent Freixe as its new CEO, effective from Sept. 1.
L’Oréal outperforms Nestlé since Swiss firm’s 1974 buy-in https://reut.rs/3Xr3Whf
Editing by Liam Proud and Streisand Neto
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
