New consumer CEOs start life in the slow lane
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
By Aimee Donnellan
LONDON, Sept 24 (Reuters Breakingviews) -The bosses of large consumer groups have good reason to watch their backs. Nestlé NESN.S, Starbucks SBUX.O, Davide Campari Milano CPRI.MI and now Nike NKE.N have all ditched their CEOs in recent months amid poor performance. Admittedly, there is plenty the new bosses can do to unpick past mistakes. But it’s probably no accident that all four switches happened amid weaker consumer spending. It suggests quick fixes may be out of reach.
Nike last Thursday said that former executive Elliott Hill would return to replace CEO John Donahoe, whose term as chief of the $130 billion sportswear giant started in 2020. That followed $250 billion Nestlé’s sudden replacement of CEO Mark Schneider with insider Laurent Freixe, announced late last month, and Starbucks’ mid-August decision to bring Chipotle CMG.N head Brian Niccol in for Laxman Narasimhan after less than two years. The award for the quickest switcheroo, however, goes to $10 billion Aperol and Courvoisier maker Campari, which announced on Wednesday that CEO Matteo Fantacchiotti would leave for “personal reasons” after just five months.
The changes surprised investors. The Starbucks move initially added $20 billion to the coffee chain’s value, while Nike’s shares closed up 7% on Friday. It’s also part of a wider trend towards shorter CEO tenures. The average term of an S&P 500 boss has declined from a peak of over 11 years to less than nine years last year, according to data from executive recruitment firm Spencer Stuart.
There’s plenty for the new guard to get their teeth stuck into. Nestlé, for example, has probably underinvested in advertising for years. At Starbucks, Niccol could improve the company’s digital-marketing strategy and quality of food and drink. Outgoing Nike CEO Donahoe, meanwhile, arguably pushed too aggressively into direct-to-consumer selling while neglecting retail channels, which new boss Hill could potentially try to revive.
On the other hand, it’s unlikely to be a coincidence that four large consumer-facing brands have suffered from slowing sales growth simultaneously. A weaker global economy is also to blame. Campari, for starters, is struggling because of weak Chinese demand. In the first six months of the year, its Asia Pacific sales fell by 12% year-on-year. Fantacchiotti left after he suggested that the wider drinks market was still on the soft side. Starbucks and Nike’s problems, however, are closer to home. Inflation is making shoppers more cost conscious, which is leading to disappointing sales. Nestlé, which sells Nescafé and KitKats, is also exposed to a weaker U.S. consumer.
The upshot is that any shareholders hoping for a quick recovery in sales may be disappointed. Economic slowdowns have a habit of revealing the strategic problems lurking underneath a company’s surface. But they’re also a tough time to launch a turnaround.
Follow @aimeedonnellan on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Nike said on Sept. 19 that former senior executive Elliott Hill would rejoin the company to succeed John Donahoe as president and CEO, as part of an effort to revive sales and battle rising competition.
Campari CEO Matteo Fantacchiotti abruptly quit on Sept. 18 after only five months in charge of the Italian spirits group, with the company citing personal reasons for his departure.
Nestlé on Aug. 22 replaced CEO Mark Schneider with veteran insider Laurent Freixe.
Starbucks on Aug. 13 named Brian Niccol as chairman and CEO, replacing Laxman Narasimhan.
Graphic: CEO switchers have experienced slowing revenue growth https://reut.rs/3NduFYV
Editing by Liam Proud and Oliver Taslic
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
