New Mexico studies oil drilling restrictions that would hit output, revenue
Study examines proposed drilling restrictions to protect public from oil and gas pollution
Restrictions could result in 12.5 million barrels lost in first year, study says
Environmental advocate argues health costs outweigh revenue loss
Adds comments by chief economist at New Mexico's Legislative Finance Committee, paragraphs 3-4
By Georgina McCartney
NEW YORK, Oct 25 (Reuters) -A top economist for the state of New Mexico, the second-largest oil-producer in the U.S., this week released a study on potential drilling restrictions that could hit up to 5.4% of its future crude output and result in billions of dollars in lost revenue.
The study evaluated setback proposals from the 2024 legislative session, which would restrict how close operators can drill to certain structures and environmental areas. They are intended to protect the public from oil and gas pollution.
"The topic is complicated and required more time to evaluate and analyze than what was provided during the session. This presentation was to provide the committee with further analysis," said Ismael Torres, chief economist at New Mexico's Legislative Finance Committee.
"It is too early to know what, if any, setbacks will be proposed in the upcoming session," he added.
The setbacks evaluated in the report would take effect in 2026 and would affect 15% of new wells in the state, of which about a third would be lost, according to Torres.
That would amount to roughly 12.5 million barrels of oil output lost in the first year, and around 35 million barrels by the early 2030s.
Production value lost would peak at around $4.5 billion annually by 2034.
New Mexico houses portions of the prolific Permian shale field, which also crosses into Texas. The state was producing some 2.04 million barrels per day in July, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
The report estimates more than half of the affected wells are on private land, a quarter of which are in Lea County, one of the fastest-growing oil-producing counties in the United States.
"A statewide setback would not accomplish increased mitigation of human health effects from oil and gas production, but it would be a detriment to the continued development of oil and gas resources and, ultimately, the State of New Mexico," said Missi Currier, chief executive officer of the New Mexico Oil & Gas Association industry group.
The report was presented to the state's Legislative Finance Committee on Tuesday.
The setbacks evaluated in the report would prevent operators from drilling within 2,250 feet (686 m) of most residential, education, health or correctional institutions, and halt drilling 650 feet from streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, or irrigation infrastructure.
It would limit activity within 300 feet of all other surface water.
"The cost to human health and our natural resources far outweigh whatever revenue would be lost to the state," said Charlie Barrett, a New Mexico environmental advocate and thermographer at the environmental group Earthworks.
"Setbacks are critical to protecting communities, schools and businesses," he added.
Reporting by Georgina McCartney in New York; Editing by Matthew Lewis
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
