XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

The duo atop the biggest and most contentious US LNG exporter



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>NEWSMAKER-The duo atop the biggest and most contentious US LNG exporter</title></head><body>

The two industry outsiders upending LNG markets

Venture Global LNG has shot up the ranks of gas exporters

Customers BP, Shell say the pair flout industry norms

By Curtis Williams

HOUSTON, June 11 (Reuters) -U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter Venture Global LNG this year became one of the country's largest producers of the superchilled gas and the industry's most contentious supplier, facing contract claims by six customers.

The duo who founded the company, co-chairs Michael Sabel and Robert Pender, have turned the booming business upside down through strong contracts, good timing and a business plan to rapidly build three giant plants.

Sabel, a former investment banker, and financial lawyer Pender, have successfully fended off accusations of self-dealing by BP BP.L, Shell SHEL.L, Repsol SA REP.MC, OrlenPKN.WA, Galp Energia GALP.LS and Edison SpA EDNn.MI. They oversee a business aiming to produce over 100 million metric tons of LNG.

On Monday, a U.S. energy regulator sided with customers of its first plant, ordering the pair to turn over documents showing why their initial Calcasieu Pass plant remains in a commissioning phase more than two years after startup.

At issue is the company's insistence it does not have to supply the six because their contracts allow it to decide when the Louisianaplant is ready. Venture Global contends it is not, even though they have been selling spot cargoes since early 2022.

Shell, BP and others say the project is producing LNG above its 10 MTPA capacity and has profited to the tune of billions of dollars that belong to them. They and two others have contract arbitration claims against Venture Global.


SEIZING ON SMALL SCALE

Neither of Venture Global's owners had any experience in LNG before starting the company. Sabel and Pender had tried unsuccessfully in 2009 to develop a coal plant in Sri Lanka, before getting the LNG bug.

They seized on LNG when considering how Haiti could import small amounts of gas for its needs. Sabel felt it could work if there were small-scale gas plants built from modular components.

"The scale had become so gigantic, risky and too expensive. So our Eureka moment was let's bring the scale down, small enough so you can build it (processing equipment) in factories," Sabel said in an interview last year.

They signed on with LNG equipment maker Baker Hughes BKR.O, which was developing modular trains, or chillers that turn gas into a liquid, and are built in factories and snapped together like Legos to more quickly start exports.

"What they did was a modular design which enabled them, from an execution timeline, to deliver," said Lorenzo Simonelli, CEO of Baker Hughes.

Sabel and Pender are "very driven professionals" who have succeeded with their LNG dream, he said.

To bring their vision to life, however, they needed customers willing to sign long-term contracts to convince financiers to back their plan. That led to processing deals at about $1.75 per million British thermal units, about 60% of the going rate at the time. They struck deals with BP, Edison, Galp, Repsol, Shell, and Orlen PKN.WA.

In a March letter to U.S. regulators, Shell said Venture Global has flouted "LNG industry norms" by turning a routine months-long startup process into years to keep cargoes for its own use.

It "has abused, and is continuing to abuse, the regulatory process to achieve its commercial objectives," Shell wrote, pointing to the pair's sale of 257 cargoes from a plant they claim is not ready for commercial sales.


BILLIONS IN PROFIT

The company sold that LNG on the spot market for what Shell estimated was $48.8 million per cargo, or $29 million more than if those cargoes were delivered under its contracts. Calcasieu Pass collected $7.6 billion in sales through the end of 2023, "$4.5 billion more than if sold at average prices," it told regulators.

Venture Global CEO Sabel acknowledged its contract prices were significantly lower than others, but he said had it been able to sign deals at higher prices, it "would have helped us a lot more."

He rejects Shell's contention that Calcasieu Pass was built on the backs of its long-term contract holders and believes when it delivers gas to those buyers by early next year, "the issue as it relates to CP1 (Calcasieu Pass) goes away."



Reporting by Curtis Williams in Houston; Editing by Gary McWilliams, Marguerita Choy and David Gregorio

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.