US Senate committee questions tech executives about election threats
By Katie Paul
NEW YORK, Sept 18 (Reuters) -U.S. lawmakers questioned tech executives on Wednesday about their preparations for battling foreign disinformation threats ahead of elections in November, with both the senators and executivesidentifying the 48 hours around Election Day as the most vulnerable time.
"There is a potential moment of peril ahead. Today we are 48 days away from the election... the most perilous moment will come, I think, 48 hours before the election," Microsoft MSFT.O President Brad Smith testified at the hearing, held by the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee.
Senator Mark Warner, who chairs the panel, agreed with Smith but said the 48 hoursafter the polls close on Nov. 5 couldbe "equally if not more significant," especially if the election is close.
Policy executives from Google GOOGL.O and Meta META.O, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, also testified at the hearing.
Elon Musk's X was invited to testify but declined, several senators said. An X spokesperson said the reason was that the company's invited witness, former head of global affairs Nick Pickles, had resigned earlier this month.
TikTok was not invited to participate, according to a company spokesperson.
To illustrate his concern about the time immediately before people vote, Smith referred to a case from Slovakia's 2023 election, in which a purported voice recording of a party leader talking about rigging the vote emerged shortly before the election and spread online. The recording was fake.
Warner and other senators also pointed to tactics revealed in a U.S. crackdown on alleged Russian influence efforts earlier this month, involving fake websites made to look like real U.S. news organizations including Fox News and the Washington Post.
"How does this get through? How do we know how extensive this is?" Warner asked the executives. He requested that the companies share data with the committee by next week showing how many Americans viewed the content and how many advertisements ran to promote it.
Tech companies have largely embraced labeling and watermarking to address risks posed by new generative artificial intelligence technologies, which have made fake but realistic-seeming images, audio and video easy to produce and raised concerns about their impact on elections.
Asked how the companies would react if such a deepfake of a political candidate were to surface immediately before the elections, Smith and Meta's President of Global Affairs Nick Cleggboth said their companies would apply labels to the content.
Clegg said Meta also potentially would suppress its circulation.
Reporting by Katie Paul; editing by Diane Craft
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
