Red Sea insurance costs soar as Houthi shipping threats loom, sources say
War premiums for Red Sea voyage more than doubled since September, sources say
Houthis' attacks on vessels increase risks and costs for shipping
Smaller insurers are pausing Red Sea war coverage due to heightened risks, sources say
By Jonathan Saul and Carolyn Cohn
LONDON, Sept 19 (Reuters) -The cost of insuring a ship through the Red Sea has more than doubled since the start of September and some underwriters are pausing cover as the risk of attack from Yemen's Houthis on commercial vessels increases, industry sources said.
The Iran-backed Houthis first launched aerial drone and missile strikes on the waterway in November. They say they are acting in solidarity with Palestinians under assault in Israel's war on Gaza. In more than 70 attacks, the Houthis have sunk two vessels, seized another and killed at least three seafarers.
The industry sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, said additional war risk premiums, paid when vessels sail through the Red Sea, were quoted up to 2% of the value of vessel from 0.7% at the start of September and after the attack on the Greek operated Sounion tanker, which was on fire for weeks.
"Currently, we are seeing premiums as high as 2% on vessel value for a single Red Sea transit amid fluctuating insurer appetite," said Louise Nevill, UK CEO, marine, cargo & logistics, with broker Marsh.
The Houthis have said they will attack ships with links to the UK, the United States or have called at Israeli ports, although other vessels have been in the firing line, adding to dangers and also the costs involved.
"A lot of the smaller insurers are no longer prepared to underwrite Red Sea war coverage," said David Smith, head of marine with insurance broker McGill and Partners.
"It’s the first time I've seen underwriters just say no."
Insurance industry sources said there was still some cover available but the costs were rising.
"There is a lot of selection by those still willing to write ships," an underwriting source said, suggesting insurers were becoming increasingly cautious and selective. "Ships that are probable targets for attack are now struggling to find cover."
The Sounion, which was struck on Aug. 21 and laden with about one million barrels of crude oil, was towed without any oil spill, the EU naval mission said on Monday.
There have been no claims so far on the Sounion, with the vessel's value estimated at $80 million, three sources said.
They added that the war insurance policy was provided by a consortium led by underwriter Brit. The consortium of underwriters also included Antares, Iquw, Hamilton, Westfield and Aspen.
Aspen and Brit, a unit of Canadian insurer Fairfax, both declined to comment. Antares, Iquw, Hamilton and Westfield did not respond to a request for comment.
Editing by William Maclean
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
