Elon Musk, Tesla win dismissal of lawsuit claiming they rigged dogecoin
Adds details from decision, comment from Musk's lawyer, case citation, background, paragraphs 3, 6-10 14
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, Aug 29 (Reuters) -Elon Musk and his electric vehicle company Tesla TSLA.O won the dismissal of a federal lawsuit accusing them of defrauding investors by hyping the cryptocurrency dogecoin and conducting insider trading, causing billions of dollars of losses.
The decision was issued on Thursday night by U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein in Manhattan.
Investors accused the world's richest person of using Twitter posts, a 2021 appearance on NBC's "Saturday Night Live" and other publicity stunts to trade profitably at their expense through several dogecoin wallets that he or Tesla controlled.
They also said Musk deliberately drove up dogecoin's DOGE=KRKN price more than 36,000% over two years and then let it crash, with he and Tesla often timing trades to Musk's public statements and activities concerning dogecoin.
Investors said this included when Musk sold dogecoin in April 2023 after replacing Twitter's blue bird logo with the dogecoin Shiba Inu dog logo, causing dogecoin's price to rise 30%.
Hellerstein, however, said Musk's tweets that dogecoin was the future currency of Earth, and could be used to buy Teslas or literally flown to the moon by his company SpaceX were "aspirational and puffery, not factual and susceptible to being falsified."
The judge said that meant no reasonable investor could rely on the tweets to pursue a securities fraud claim. He also said it was "not possible to understand" the investors' market manipulation and insider trading claims.
Hellerstein dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again. Investors originally sought $258 billion and had amended their complaint four times in two years.
Lawyers for the investors did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Musk's lawyer Alex Spiro said in an emailed statement: "It's a very good day for dogecoin."
In seeking a dismissal, Musk's lawyers said there was nothing wrong his "innocuous and often silly tweets."
They also said there was no proof Musk owned two wallets for conducting suspicious trading, or that he or Tesla ever sold dogecoin.
On "Saturday Night Live," Musk called dogecoin a "hustle" while playing a fictitious financial expert on a segment of "Weekend Update."
Musk bought Twitter in October 2022 and rebranded it X. He is worth $239.3 billion according to Forbes magazine.
The case is Gorog et al v. Musk et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-05037.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Jamie Freed
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
