XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Europe’s CO2 fines undermine carmakers’ progress



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>BREAKINGVIEWS-Europe’s CO2 fines undermine carmakers’ progress</title></head><body>

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

By Neil Unmack

LONDON, Sept 19 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Europe’s carmakers are asking for help on the bloc’s carbon emissions rules, which imply steep fines starting next year. Governments can help the industry swerve the crunch relatively easily, but the bigger question is whether politicians are willing to do what’s necessary to help hit ambitious long-term electric-vehicle goals.

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) on Thursday called for “relief” on 2025 carbon targets, which it fears could result in “multi-billion euro” fines. At first glance, it sounds like special pleading, not least because the carmakers were well-warned. The rules require a 15% cut, relative to 2021 levels, in the average amount of carbon emitted per car per kilometre. It’s been obvious for years that auto groups with fossil fuel-intensive fleets would face fines.

Yet the blame doesn’t lie exclusively with the companies. One problem is that electric-vehicle sales are going into reverse across the bloc. The share of battery-powered rides in August fell to 14.4% of overall sales from 21% a year earlier, the ACEA said, making it hard to meet the targets. It’s partly down to high costs, arguably worsened by limited state subsidies, and the scant options for car-charging stations. Nor have carmakers shirked when it comes to investing and electrifying their fleet: capital expenditures have surged in recent years.

Luca de Meo, who heads the lobby group and is also the CEO of France’s Renault RENA.PA, has suggested that penalties could reach 15 billion euros overall. A fine of that magnitude would amount to nearly 20% of Volkswagen VOWG_p.DE, Stellantis STLAM.MI, BMW BMWG.DE, Mercedes-Benz MBGn.DE and Renault’s pre-tax profit next year, according to LSEG data. That’s a painful hit at a time when the groups are contending with a sluggish economy and the emergence of Chinese competition. Perversely, the fines could set them back on the path to electrification.

Luckily, the EU could in theory help the industry with some relatively simple delays to the 2025 targets. That would buy time. Carmakers are cranking out new electric models, which should help EV sales next year. Volkswagen, probably the most steeply affected by 2025 targets of the large European carmakers, is planning to launch 30 new cars over the next year, half of which are electric. The proliferation of cheaper battery rides, like the 25,000-euro Renault 5, will help.

The tougher issue is what happens next, with a 55% cut to emissions required by 2030 and a total phaseout by 2035. Getting there requires a dramatic increase in electric-vehicle demand. ACEA estimates that some 1.4 million charging points need to be installed per year through 2030, nearly 10 times the 2023 level. And auto groups require a steady and reliable source of batteries, at a time when geopolitical risks are rising and European champions like Northvolt are struggling. To hit those longer-term targets, governments will need to put their own hands in their pockets.


Follow @Unmack1 on X


CONTEXT NEWS

The European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA), the industry group representing carmakers in the region, called in a Sept. 19 public letter for relief on looming fines if they miss carbon emission targets that come into force in 2025.

In addition, the group called for an earlier review of the EU’s broader carbon targets, which include a phasing out of internal combustion engines by 2035.

“We are missing crucial conditions to reach the necessary boost in production and adoption of zero-emission vehicles: charging and hydrogen refilling infrastructure, as well as a competitive manufacturing environment, affordable green energy, purchase and tax incentives, and a secure supply of raw materials, hydrogen and batteries,” ACEA said in a statement.

“This raises the daunting prospect of either multi-billion-euro fines, which could otherwise be invested in the zero-emission transition, or unnecessary production cuts, job losses, and a weakened European supply and value chain at a time when we face fierce competition from other automaking regions.”


European carmakers' rising capital expenditures https://reut.rs/3XRzBYn


Editing by Liam Proud and Streisand Neto

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.