Fed's Waller: Weak inflation data cemented case for 50 basis point cut
Updates with more comments from Waller, background on inflation data
By Howard Schneider
WASHINGTON, Sept 20 (Reuters) -U.S.Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller, one of the more ardent voices in the central bank's battle to hike interest rates to tame inflation, said he supported a larger rate cut this week because he is now worried the pace of price increases is undershooting the Fed's target.
Waller said that inflation data received during the days ahead of this week's meeting led to estimates that one key measure of inflation the Fed tracks for its 2% target may have run well below that for the four months through August.
August PCE data will not be released until next week, but the chief components of it were in hand for the Fed's meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday, allowing officials a good base for estimation.
"If this estimate comes in correct, core PCE is running below our target, and that's with very high housing services inflation," Waller said on CNBC, referring to the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index stripped of volatile food and energy components that are not thought to reflect underlying inflation trends.
"That is what put me back a bit to say, wow, inflation is softening much faster than I thought it was going to. And that is what put me over the edge to say, look, I think 50 (basis points) is the right thing to do," Waller said, bracing comments from someone who had a prominent role in crafting the Fed's inflation response.
His comments supplemented those of Fed chair Jerome Powell this week, who after the Fed meeting focused on risks to the job market as the chief rationale for the larger than expected Fed cut and did not explicitly discuss concerns about below-target inflation.
Traders took Waller's comment to heart and advanced bets that the central bank would approve another half-point cut at its November meeting.
Waller said incoming data would drive that decision, but that he would have no problem with further big cuts if that is what seems needed to keep inflation near target. The Fed spent much of the decade before the 2020 pandemic trying to generate price pressures in the economy to meet the 2% level that policymakers have decided keeps wage and price setters forward-looking and provides a buffer against deflation without unduly influencing borrowing and spending decisions.
"I was a big advocate of large rate hikes when inflation was moving much, much faster than any expected. And I would feel the same way on the downside to protect our credibility of maintaining a 2% inflation target," Waller said. "So if the data starts coming in soft and continues to come in soft, I would be much more willing to be aggressive on cuts."
Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
