XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

US labor board wrongly ordered Tesla's Musk to delete anti-union tweet, court rules



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>US labor board wrongly ordered Tesla's Musk to delete anti-union tweet, court rules</title></head><body>

By Nate Raymond

Oct 25 (Reuters) -A divided U.S. appeals court on Friday ruled that the National Labor Relations Board went too far by ordering Tesla TSLA.O CEO Elon Musk to delete a 2018 tweet stating employees of the electric vehicle maker would lose stock options if they unionized.

The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on a 9-8 vote threw out an NLRB order from 2021 that had concluded the tweet amounted to an unlawful threat after the court concluded the tweet amounted to free speech protected by the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.

"Deleting the speech of private citizens on topics of public concern is not a remedy traditionally countenanced by American law," the court held in an unsigned opinion joined by eight of the nine judges in the majority.

That finding was enough to warrant overturning the NLRB's 2021 decision, according to those judges, who were all appointed by Republican presidents. As a result meant, it did not decide whether the tweet itself violated the National Labor Relations Act.

The court also directed the NLRB to reconsider its decision ordering Tesla to reinstate a pro-union employee who was fired. U.S. Circuit Judge James Dennis, in a dissenting opinion joined by seven other judges, including all of the court's Democratic appointees, called the ruling "light on law and facts."

Representatives for Tesla and the NLRB did not respond to requests for comment.

The case predated Musk's purchase of Twitter, now known as X, in 2022 for $44 billion, a platform the world's richest man has long prolifically used.

Amid an organizing campaign at Tesla's Fremont, California, plant by the United Auto Workers union, Musk tweeted: "Nothing stopping Tesla team at our car plant from voting union... But why pay union dues & give up stock options for nothing?"

Tesla argued the tweet was not a threat and merely reflected the fact that union workers at other auto companies did not receive stock options. A three-judge 5th Circuit panel disagreed in March 2023, but the full appeals court elected to rehear the case.

Musk's rocket company SpaceX is separately suing the NLRB, claiming its in-house enforcement proceedings are unconstitutional.



Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by William Mallard

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.